Adams, R.M., O. Bergland, W.N. Musser, S.L. Johnson and L.M. Musser. 1989. User fees and equity issues in public hunting expenditures: The case of ring-necked pheasant in Oregon. Land Economics 65(4):376-385.
OR
E.E. Wilson Wildlife Area
Pheasant
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.31
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Moose
Contingent Valuation Method
$182.01
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$106.86
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$137.39
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$105.69
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$123.30
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.37
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$166.75
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.58
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$88.07
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$64.59
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.20
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$76.33
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$93.94
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$90.43
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$119.78
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$171.45
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$152.66
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.89
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.37
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$95.12
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$58.71
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$89.24
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$75.15
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$58.71
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$42.28
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$78.68
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$124.47
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.37
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$104.51
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.98
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$96.29
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.51
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$103.33
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.98
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.72
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
RI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.54
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$110.38
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$112.74
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$79.85
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$123.30
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
USA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$91.60
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$103.33
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.98
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.02
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$78.68
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$96.29
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$15.26
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$105.69
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
USA
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$95.12
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$105.69
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.51
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.89
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$93.94
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.12
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.84
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$100.25
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$94.90
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$92.23
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.53
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$74.85
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.78
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.11
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$101.59
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$139.01
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$69.51
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$76.19
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.43
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.74
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$163.07
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$80.20
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$82.87
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$89.56
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$97.58
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$114.95
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.84
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$72.18
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$149.71
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$80.20
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$114.95
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$101.59
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.54
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$147.03
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Moose
Contingent Valuation Method
$157.73
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$65.50
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$84.21
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$64.16
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$53.47
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.82
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.82
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.43
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.13
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$191.14
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$148.37
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$155.05
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.07
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$72.18
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$72.18
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$69.51
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.79
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.84
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.49
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.12
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$122.97
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.82
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$105.60
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$89.56
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.49
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$90.89
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$101.59
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$147.03
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$40.10
Per Person Per Day
Balkan, E. and J.R. Kahn. 1988. The value of changes in deer hunting quality: A travel cost approach. Applied Economics 20(4):533-539.
USA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$339.32
Per Person Per Day*
Balkan, E. and J.R. Kahn. 1988. The value of changes in deer hunting quality: A travel cost approach. Applied Economics 20(4):533-539.
USA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$332.93
Per Person Per Day*
Bergstrom, J.C. and H.K. Cordell. 1991. An analysis of the demand for and value of outdoor recreation in the United States. Journal of Leisure Research 23(1):67-86.
USA
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$24.96
Per Person Per Day
Bergstrom, J.C. and H.K. Cordell. 1991. An analysis of the demand for and value of outdoor recreation in the United States. Journal of Leisure Research 23(1):67-86.
USA
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$25.15
Per Person Per Day
Bergstrom, J.C., J.R. Stoll, J.P. Titre and V.L. Wright. 1990. Economic value of wetlands-based recreation. Ecological Economics 2(2):129-147.
LA
Louisiana Coastal Wetlands
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$32.81
Per Person Per Day*
Bhat, G., J. Bergstrom, R.J. Teasley, J.M. Bowker and H.K. Cordell. 1998. An ecoregional approach to the economic valuation of land- and water-based recreation in the United States. Environmental Management 22(1):69-77.
CO, WY, MT, NM
Rocky Mountains
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$23.52
Per Person Per Day
Bhat, G., J. Bergstrom, R.J. Teasley, J.M. Bowker and H.K. Cordell. 1998. An ecoregional approach to the economic valuation of land- and water-based recreation in the United States. Environmental Management 22(1):69-77.
WI, IL, IN, OH, MI, KY, TN, WV, PA
Northeast and Great Lakes
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$7.27
Per Person Per Day
Bhat, G., J. Bergstrom, R.J. Teasley, J.M. Bowker and H.K. Cordell. 1998. An ecoregional approach to the economic valuation of land- and water-based recreation in the United States. Environmental Management 22(1):69-77.
MD, WV, VA, NC, SC, TN, GA, AL
Appalachian Mountains
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$10.28
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C. and T.A. Heberlein. 1979. Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(5):926-930.
WI
---
Geese
Travel Cost Method
$12.71
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C. and T.A. Heberlein. 1980. Simulated markets, hypothetical markets, and travel cost analysis: Alternative methods of estimating outdoor recreation demand. Report No. 187. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
---
Geese
Travel Cost Method
$3.86
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein and M.J. Kealy. 1983. Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market. Natural Resources Journal 23:619-633.
WI
---
Geese
Contingent Valuation Method
$9.53
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein and M.J. Kealy. 1983. Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market. Natural Resources Journal 23:619-633.
WI
---
Geese
Contingent Valuation Method
$4.99
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein and M.J. Kealy. 1983. Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market. Natural Resources Journal 23:619-633.
WI
---
Geese
Travel Cost Method
$14.62
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$27.17
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$5.02
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$14.86
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$6.34
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$12.34
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$10.39
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$9.25
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$18.41
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$13.98
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$19.75
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$12.94
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$11.30
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$10.11
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$9.31
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$9.27
Per Person Per Day*
Bishop, R.C., T.A. Heberlein, D.W. McCollum and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A validation experiment for valuation techniques. Draft Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Demonstration Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$17.92
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.75
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT, WV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$13.58
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.75
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA, IL, IN, MI, MN, MO, OH, WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.68
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS, ND, NE, SD, UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$58.84
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA, KS, MN, MO, NE, SD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.23
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN, IL, MI, OH, WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.21
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA, KS, MO, ND, NE, SD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.75
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN, IL, MN, MI, OH, WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.18
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$10.56
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR, LA, OK, TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$104.10
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL, KY, MS, TN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.70
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK, TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.18
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ, NM, OK, TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$7.54
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ, NM, NV, UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$87.51
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ, NM, UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$89.02
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO, ID, MT, OR, WY
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$89.02
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Moose
Contingent Valuation Method
$92.03
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., D. McCollum and M.F. Teisl. 1992. Empirical evidence on the sign and size of option value. Paper presented at the 1992 W1133 meeting.
ME
---
Moose
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.09
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., D. McCollum and M.F. Teisl. 1992. Empirical evidence on the sign and size of option value. Paper presented at the 1992 W1133 meeting.
ME
---
Moose
Contingent Valuation Method
$285.81
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling and M.L. Phillips. 1990. Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife. Leisure Sciences 12(1):103-118.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$17.94
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling and M.L. Phillips. 1990. Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife. Leisure Sciences 12(1):103-118.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.98
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling and M.L. Phillips. 1990. Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife. Leisure Sciences 12(1):103-118.
ME
---
Rabbit
Contingent Valuation Method
$4.50
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling and M.L. Phillips. 1990. Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife. Leisure Sciences 12(1):103-118.
ME
---
Rabbit
Contingent Valuation Method
$5.38
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling and M.L. Phillips. 1990. Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife. Leisure Sciences 12(1):103-118.
ME
---
Grouse
Contingent Valuation Method
$6.21
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling and M.L. Phillips. 1990. Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife. Leisure Sciences 12(1):103-118.
ME
---
Grouse
Contingent Valuation Method
$6.47
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$84.11
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Moose
Contingent Valuation Method
$223.09
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Turkey
Contingent Valuation Method
$76.91
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Moose
Contingent Valuation Method
$332.99
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$131.49
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Grouse
Contingent Valuation Method
$82.51
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Grouse
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.48
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Rabbit
Contingent Valuation Method
$6.49
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Bear
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.18
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Bear
Contingent Valuation Method
$89.73
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reiling, M. Teisl and M.L. Phillips. 1991. A study of the impact of game and nongame species on Maine's economy. Staff Paper No. 423. Orono, ME: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.57
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reilling and M.L. Phillips. 1989. Prices of substitutes: Implicit vs. explicit assumptions of substitute prices in contingent valuation questions. In K.J. Boyle and T. Heekin (comps), 1989, Western Regional Research Project W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning. Second Interim Report. Orono, ME: University of Maine.
ME
---
Sea duck
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.03
Per Person Per Day
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reilling and M.L. Phillips. 1989. Prices of substitutes: Implicit vs. explicit assumptions of substitute prices in contingent valuation questions. In K.J. Boyle and T. Heekin (comps), 1989, Western Regional Research Project W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning. Second Interim Report. Orono, ME: University of Maine.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$189.92
Per Person Per Day
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reilling and M.L. Phillips. 1989. Prices of substitutes: Implicit vs. explicit assumptions of substitute prices in contingent valuation questions. In K.J. Boyle and T. Heekin (comps), 1989, Western Regional Research Project W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning. Second Interim Report. Orono, ME: University of Maine.
ME
---
Rabbit
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.57
Per Person Per Day
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reilling and M.L. Phillips. 1989. Prices of substitutes: Implicit vs. explicit assumptions of substitute prices in contingent valuation questions. In K.J. Boyle and T. Heekin (comps), 1989, Western Regional Research Project W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning. Second Interim Report. Orono, ME: University of Maine.
ME
---
Grouse
Contingent Valuation Method
$78.12
Per Person Per Day
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reilling and M.L. Phillips. 1989. Prices of substitutes: Implicit vs. explicit assumptions of substitute prices in contingent valuation questions. In K.J. Boyle and T. Heekin (comps), 1989, Western Regional Research Project W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning. Second Interim Report. Orono, ME: University of Maine.
ME
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.79
Per Person Per Day
Boyle, K.J., S.D. Reilling and M.L. Phillips. 1989. Prices of substitutes: Implicit vs. explicit assumptions of substitute prices in contingent valuation questions. In K.J. Boyle and T. Heekin (comps), 1989, Western Regional Research Project W-133, Benefits and Costs in Natural Resources Planning. Second Interim Report. Orono, ME: University of Maine.
ME
---
Bear
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.85
Per Person Per Day
Brooks, R. 1988. The net economic value of deer hunting in Montana. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$42.46
Per Person Per Day
Brooks, R. 1988. The net economic value of deer hunting in Montana. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$120.87
Per Person Per Day
Brooks, R. 1993. A contingent valuation assessment of black bear hunting: Hunter attitudes and economic benefits. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Bear
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.48
Per Person Per Day*
Brooks, R. 1993. A contingent valuation assessment of black bear hunting: Hunter attitudes and economic benefits. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Bear
Contingent Valuation Method
$141.47
Per Person Per Day*
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.71
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.60
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.60
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.97
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.84
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.86
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.60
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.86
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.73
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.47
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$54.58
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.35
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.20
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.35
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.73
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.60
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.73
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.35
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.35
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.71
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$40.22
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.71
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.35
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$60.33
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$60.33
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
RI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$54.58
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$40.22
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.20
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.84
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.97
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.71
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.20
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.08
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.08
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.97
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.84
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.97
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.84
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$60.33
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$54.58
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.20
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.71
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$40.22
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$74.69
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.97
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$80.44
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.95
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$71.82
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.71
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.71
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$80.44
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$80.44
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.46
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.84
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.95
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.98
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.98
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.98
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.86
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.60
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.60
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.47
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$20.11
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.98
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.98
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.35
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.09
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.47
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.73
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$54.58
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.47
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.35
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.73
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G. and M.J. Hay. 1987. Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Working Paper No. 23. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.73
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G.M. and J. Hammack. 1972. A preliminary investigation of the economics of migratory waterfowl. In J.V. Krutilla (ed.), Natural Environments: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 171-204.
AZ, CA, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$157.26
Per Person Per Day*
Brown, G.M. and M. Plummer. 1979. Recreation valuation: An economic analysis of nontimber uses of forestland in the Pacific Northwest. Pullman, WA: Forest Policy Project, Washington State University.
ID
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$88.62
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G.M. and M. Plummer. 1979. Recreation valuation: An economic analysis of nontimber uses of forestland in the Pacific Northwest. Pullman, WA: Forest Policy Project, Washington State University.
ID
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$89.16
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G.M. and M. Plummer. 1979. Recreation valuation: An economic analysis of nontimber uses of forestland in the Pacific Northwest. Pullman, WA: Forest Policy Project, Washington State University.
OR
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$158.68
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G.M. and M. Plummer. 1979. Recreation valuation: An economic analysis of nontimber uses of forestland in the Pacific Northwest. Pullman, WA: Forest Policy Project, Washington State University.
ID
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$183.72
Per Person Per Day
Brown, W.G., F. Nawas and J. Stevens. 1973. The Oregon big game resource: An economic evaluation. Special Report 379. Corvallis, OR: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University.
OR
Central Oregon
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$39.39
Per Person Per Day
Brown, W.G., F. Nawas and J. Stevens. 1973. The Oregon big game resource: An economic evaluation. Special Report 379. Corvallis, OR: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University.
OR
Northeast Oregon
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$62.58
Per Person Per Day
Brown, W.G., F. Nawas and J. Stevens. 1973. The Oregon big game resource: An economic evaluation. Special Report 379. Corvallis, OR: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University.
OR
Southeast Oregon
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$15.31
Per Person Per Day
Brown, W.G., F. Nawas and J. Stevens. 1973. The Oregon big game resource: An economic evaluation. Special Report 379. Corvallis, OR: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University.
OR
Northwest Oregon
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$19.05
Per Person Per Day
Brown, W.G., F. Nawas and J. Stevens. 1973. The Oregon big game resource: An economic evaluation. Special Report 379. Corvallis, OR: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University.
OR
Southwest Oregon
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$23.94
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Grouse
Contingent Valuation Method
$105.60
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$92.40
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$83.60
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$145.20
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$171.60
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Turkey
Contingent Valuation Method
$88.00
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$74.80
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Big Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$281.60
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$101.20
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$167.20
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Determinants and economic values of hunting and fishing. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 43:391-403.
USA
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$171.60
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Estimating marginal values of waterfowl for hunting. Working paper No. 8. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
Central Flyway
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$116.92
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Estimating marginal values of waterfowl for hunting. Working paper No. 8. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
Atlantic Flyway
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$149.19
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Estimating marginal values of waterfowl for hunting. Working paper No. 8. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
Mississippi Flyway
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$131.95
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Estimating marginal values of waterfowl for hunting. Working paper No. 8. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
Pacific Flyway
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$124.99
Per Person Per Day
Charbonneau, J.J. and M.J. Hay. 1978. Estimating marginal values of waterfowl for hunting. Working paper No. 8. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
Pacific Flyway
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$157.26
Per Person Per Day
Cooper, J.C. and J.B. Loomis. 1991. Economic value of wildlife resources in the San joaquin Valley: Hunting and viewing values. In A. Dinar and D. Zilberman (eds.), The Economic and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Pp. 447-463.
CA
San Joaquin Valley
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$110.88
Per Person Per Day
Cooper, J.C. and J.B. Loomis. 1993. Testing whether waterfowl hunting benefits increase with greater water deliveries to wetlands. Environmental and Resource Economics 3:545-561.
CA
San Joaquin Valley National Wildlife Refuge
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$29.82
Per Person Per Day
Cooper, J.C. and J.B. Loomis. 1993. Testing whether waterfowl hunting benefits increase with greater water deliveries to wetlands. Environmental and Resource Economics 3:545-561.
CA
San Joaquin Valley National Wildlife Refuge
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$50.04
Per Person Per Day
Cory, D.C. and W.E. Martin. 1985. Valuing wildlife for efficient multiple use: Elk vs. cattle. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 10(2):282-293.
AZ
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.23
Per Person Per Day*
Creel, M.D. and J.B. Loomis. 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434-441.
CA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$30.05
Per Person Per Day*
Creel, M.D. and J.B. Loomis. 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434-441.
CA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$61.80
Per Person Per Day*
Creel, M.D. and J.B. Loomis. 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434-441.
CA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$47.17
Per Person Per Day*
Creel, M.D. and J.B. Loomis. 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434-441.
CA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$14.77
Per Person Per Day*
Creel, M.D. and J.B. Loomis. 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434-441.
CA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$28.19
Per Person Per Day*
Creel, M.D. and J.B. Loomis. 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434-441.
CA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$65.59
Per Person Per Day*
Creel, M.D. and J.B. Loomis. 1990. Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:434-441.
CA
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$69.52
Per Person Per Day*
Davis, R.K. 1964. The value of big game hunting in a private forest. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 29:393-403.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$15.52
Per Person Per Day
Donnelly, D.M. and L.J. Nelson. 1986. Net economic value of deer hunting in Idaho. Resource Bulletin RM-13. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$57.38
Per Person Per Day
Donnelly, D.M. and L.J. Nelson. 1986. Net economic value of deer hunting in Idaho. Resource Bulletin RM-13. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.59
Per Person Per Day
Donnelly, D.M. and L.J. Nelson. 1986. Net economic value of deer hunting in Idaho. Resource Bulletin RM-13. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$65.89
Per Person Per Day
Duffield, J.W. 1988. The net economic value of elk hunting in Montana. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Elk
Travel Cost Method
$144.50
Per Person Per Day
Duffield, J.W. 1988. The net economic value of elk hunting in Montana. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Elk
Travel Cost Method
$58.63
Per Person Per Day
Duffield, J.W. and C. Neher. 1990. A contingent valuation assessment of Montana deer hunting: Hunter attitudes and economic benefits. Report prepared for Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Missoula, MT: University of Montana and Bioeconomics Associates.
MT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$122.86
Per Person Per Day
Duffield, J.W. and C. Neher. 1991. Montana waterfowl hunting: A contingent valuation assessment of economic benefits and hunter attitudes. Report prepared for Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Missoula, MT: University of Montana and Bioeconomics, Inc.
MT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.44
Per Person Per Day*
Feltus, D.G. and E.E. Langenau. 1984. Optimization of firearm deer hunting and timber values in northern lower Michigan. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12:6-12.
MI
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$12.10
Per Person Per Day
Feltus, D.G. and E.E. Langenau. 1984. Optimization of firearm deer hunting and timber values in northern lower Michigan. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12:6-12.
MI
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$13.25
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$61.56
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$22.72
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$33.81
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$39.05
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$38.57
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$9.32
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$43.54
Per Person Per Day
Garrett, J.R., G.J. Pon and D.J. Arosteguy. 1970. Economics of big game resource use in Nevada. Reno, NV: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nevada Reno.
NV
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$65.17
Per Person Per Day
Glass, R.J. and T.A. More. 1992. Equity preferences in the allocation of goose hunting opportunities. Journal of Environmental Management 35(4):271-279.
VT
Dead Creek Wildlife Management Area
Geese
Contingent Valuation Method
$69.47
Per Person Per Day*
Goodwin, B.K., L.A. Offenback, T.T. Cable and P.S. Cook. 1993. Discrete/continuous contingent valuation of private hunting access in Kansas. Journal of Environmental Management 39(1):1-12.
KS
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$9.51
Per Person Per Day*
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
WY
---
Antelope
Contingent Valuation Method
$58.34
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
NV
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.01
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
UT
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$347.38
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
WY
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$185.59
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
ID
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$98.17
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
ID
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$155.59
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
NV
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$128.97
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
NV
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$324.86
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
UT
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$209.93
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
UT
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$111.45
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
WY
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.89
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
WY
---
Small Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$220.00
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
ID
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.54
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
NV
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$213.36
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
UT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$136.18
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
WY
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$295.46
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
ID
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$100.94
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
ID
---
Antelope
Contingent Valuation Method
$86.24
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
NV
---
Antelope
Contingent Valuation Method
$164.25
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
ID
---
Big Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$187.53
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
WY
---
Big Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$285.08
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
NV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$320.68
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$184.23
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
WY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$117.83
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, C.S. 1977. A report on the value of wildilfe with 1979 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
ID
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$178.82
Per Person Per Day
Hansen, L., P. Feather and D. Shank. 1999. Valuation of agriculture's multi-site environmental impacts: An application to pheasant hunting. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 199-207.
WI, MN, MI, IA, IL, OH, MO, IN, ND, NE, KS, MT
---
Pheasant
Travel Cost Method
$39.98
Per Person Per Day*
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The Economics of Selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
Half Moon Wildlife Management Area
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$198.22
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The Economics of Selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
Babcock Webb Wildlife Management Area
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$212.01
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The Economics of Selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
JW Corbett Wildlife Management Area
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$184.57
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The Economics of Selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
Andrews Wildlife Management Area
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$153.41
Per Person Per Day
Hausman, J.A., G.K. Leonard and D. McFadden. 1995. A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model: Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. Journal of Public Economics 56(1):1-30.
AK
Prince William Sound
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$18.06
Per Person Per Day*
Hausman, J.A., G.K. Leonard and D. McFadden. 1995. A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model: Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. Journal of Public Economics 56(1):1-30.
AK
Prince William Sound
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$148.15
Per Person Per Day*
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$90.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$92.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
RI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$72.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$74.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$118.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$74.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$92.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$72.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$127.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$107.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$90.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$88.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$72.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$105.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$105.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$35.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$83.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$103.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic value for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing, 1985. Report 85-1. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Waterfowl
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Kay, F.R. 1988. Nevada survey of the economic value of trophy big game and deer harvest - 1984 through 1986. Biological Bulletin No. 9. Reno, NV: Nevada Department of Wildlife.
NV
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$148.02
Per Person Per Day
Kay, F.R. 1988. Nevada survey of the economic value of trophy big game and deer harvest - 1984 through 1986. Biological Bulletin No. 9. Reno, NV: Nevada Department of Wildlife.
NV
---
Bighorn Sheep
Contingent Valuation Method
$317.05
Per Person Per Day
Kay, F.R. 1988. Nevada survey of the economic value of trophy big game and deer harvest - 1984 through 1986. Biological Bulletin No. 9. Reno, NV: Nevada Department of Wildlife.
NV
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.35
Per Person Per Day
Kay, F.R. 1988. Nevada survey of the economic value of trophy big game and deer harvest - 1984 through 1986. Biological Bulletin No. 9. Reno, NV: Nevada Department of Wildlife.
NV
---
Mountain Lion
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.68
Per Person Per Day
Kay, F.R. 1988. Nevada survey of the economic value of trophy big game and deer harvest - 1984 through 1986. Biological Bulletin No. 9. Reno, NV: Nevada Department of Wildlife.
NV
---
Antelope
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.57
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B. 1982. Use of travel cost models for evaluating lottery rationed recreation: Application to big game hunting. Journal of Leisure Research 14(2):117-124.
UT
---
Antelope
Travel Cost Method
$14.29
Per Person Per Day*
Loomis, J.B. and J. Cooper. 1988. The net economic value of antelope hunting in Montana. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Antelope
Travel Cost Method
$88.75
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B. and J. Cooper. 1988. The net economic value of antelope hunting in Montana. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Antelope
Travel Cost Method
$153.80
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Moose
Travel Cost Method
$46.90
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Mountain Goat
Travel Cost Method
$220.78
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Bighorn sheep
Travel Cost Method
$68.20
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Moose
Travel Cost Method
$25.12
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Mountain Goat
Travel Cost Method
$117.75
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Antelope
Travel Cost Method
$76.44
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Antelope
Travel Cost Method
$94.64
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D.M. Donnelly, C.F. Sorg and L. Oldenburg. 1985. Net economic value of hunting unique species in Idaho: Bighorn Sheep, Mountain Goat, Moose, and Antelope. Resource Bulletin RM-10. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID
---
Bighorn sheep
Travel Cost Method
$36.38
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D. Updike and W. Unkel. 1989. Consumptive and nonconsumptive values of a game animal: The case of California deer. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 54:640-650.
CA
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$143.78
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., J. Cooper and S. Allen. 1988. The Montana elk hunting experience: A contingent valuation assessment of economic benefits to hunters. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$86.18
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., J. Cooper and S. Allen. 1988. The Montana elk hunting experience: A contingent valuation assessment of economic benefits to hunters. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
MT
---
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.76
Per Person Per Day
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$4.84
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$21.78
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$18.29
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$21.25
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$55.01
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$19.70
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$41.68
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$11.21
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$37.52
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$41.58
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$5.13
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$12.25
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$8.64
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$14.82
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$18.37
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$16.99
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$16.86
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$9.17
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$1.63
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$2.91
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$4.01
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$6.75
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$8.62
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$4.23
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$6.01
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Waterfowl
Travel Cost Method
$9.27
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$62.23
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$29.69
Per Person Per Day*
Martin, W.E., R. Gum and A. Smith. 1974. The demand for and value of hunting, fishing, and general outdoor recreation in Arizona. Technical Bulletin 211. Tucson, AZ: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arizona.
AZ
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$56.69
Per Person Per Day*
McCollum, D.W. and S.M. Miller. 1994. Alaska voters, Alaska hunters, and Alaska nonresident hunters: Their wildlife related trip characteristics and economics. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
AK
---
Big Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.94
Per Person Per Day*
McCollum, D.W. and S.M. Miller. 1994. Alaska voters, Alaska hunters, and Alaska nonresident hunters: Their wildlife related trip characteristics and economics. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
AK
---
Big Game
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.09
Per Person Per Day*
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
AR, FL, GA, MS, NC, SC, TN
Ozark-St Francis, NFS, Chattahoochee-Oconee, Francis Marion and Sumter, Cherokee
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$16.33
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID, MT
Nezperce, Idaho Panhandle, Custer, Flathead
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$9.96
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
CO, WY
White River, san Juan, Pike-San Isabel, Bighorn, Shoshone
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$9.03
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
AZ, NM
Apache-Sitgreaves, Tonto, Santa Fe, Gila
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$23.67
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
OR, WA
Willamette, Ochoco, Wallowa-Whitman, Rogue River, Wenatchee, Mt Baker-Snoqualmie
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$12.01
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID, UT, WY
Payette, Targhee, Ashley, Dixie, Wasatch-Cache, Bridger-Teton
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$9.40
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
IN, MI, NH, OH, WI, WV
Wayne-Hoosier, Huron-Manistee, White Mountain, Nicolet, Monongahela
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$17.99
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$82.83
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$83.76
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$91.01
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$101.72
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$68.02
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$165.66
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$125.80
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$116.46
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$83.45
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$111.56
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$95.16
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$74.27
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$163.80
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., R.C. Bishop and M.P. Welsh. 1988. A probabilistic travel cost model. Working paper. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
WI
Sandhill Wildlife Area
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$121.71
Per Person Per Day
Miller, J.R. and M.J. Hay. 1984. Estimating substate values of fishing and hunting. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 49:345-355.
SD
---
Small Game
Travel Cost Method
$109.17
Per Person Per Day
Miller, J.R. and M.J. Hay. 1984. Estimating substate values of fishing and hunting. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 49:345-355.
PA
---
Big Game
Travel Cost Method
$103.42
Per Person Per Day
Miller, R.R. 1980. The demand for the Colorado deer hunting experience. PhD dissertation. Colorado State University.
CO
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$241.62
Per Person Per Day
Miller, R.R. 1980. The demand for the Colorado deer hunting experience. PhD dissertation. Colorado State University.
CO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.52
Per Person Per Day
Miller, R.R. 1980. The demand for the Colorado deer hunting experience. PhD dissertation. Colorado State University.
CO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.95
Per Person Per Day
Miller, R.R. 1980. The demand for the Colorado deer hunting experience. PhD dissertation. Colorado State University.
CO
---
Deer
Travel Cost Method
$313.21
Per Person Per Day
Miller, R.R. 1980. The demand for the Colorado deer hunting experience. PhD dissertation. Colorado State University.
CO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$78.84
Per Person Per Day
Miller, R.R. 1980. The demand for the Colorado deer hunting experience. PhD dissertation. Colorado State University.
CO
---
Deer
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.74
Per Person Per Day