Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$115.08
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$42.28
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.49
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$345.24
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.49
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$76.33
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$111.55
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$123.30
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$86.90
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.67
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$58.71
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$17.61
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$137.39
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.79
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.67
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
HI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.51
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.37
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$78.68
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.45
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.93
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.53
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$405.13
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.58
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.40
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.40
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.98
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.62
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.31
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.24
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.79
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.41
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.54
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.70
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$49.32
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$73.98
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$137.39
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.40
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.24
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.62
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.67
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$54.01
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.84
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$86.90
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$99.82
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.67
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.02
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$58.71
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$65.76
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.75
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$113.91
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$90.43
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.37
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.72
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
RI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$21.14
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$42.28
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$140.92
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.10
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.58
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.62
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.24
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$83.38
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$23.48
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$99.82
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$193.76
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.45
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$32.88
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$19.97
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.79
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$92.77
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$95.12
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.53
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. 2009. Net economic values of wildlife-related recreation in 2006: Addendum to the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2006-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
USA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.93
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$84.21
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$256.64
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$155.05
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$120.30
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$430.41
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$247.28
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$152.38
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.45
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.13
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.11
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
HI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.76
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.75
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$24.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$54.80
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.14
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.45
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.09
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.83
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.44
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.55
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$387.63
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$156.39
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$160.40
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$128.32
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$104.26
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$72.18
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$24.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.78
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.07
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.09
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.45
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$69.51
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.44
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
RI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.76
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.79
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$185.80
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$97.58
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$201.84
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$100.25
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$193.82
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$179.11
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$14.70
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.12
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.73
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.78
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.74
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.49
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.40
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$76.19
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.11
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$29.41
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$29.41
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$58.81
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.44
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.73
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$13.37
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$54.80
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.17
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.75
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.79
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$88.22
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$73.52
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$24.06
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.76
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.40
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.45
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$73.52
Per Person Per Day
Aiken, R. and G.P. la Rouche. 2003. Net economic values for wildlife-related recreation in 2001: Addendum to the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 2001-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.82
Per Person Per Day
Bayless, D.S., J.C. Bergstrom, M.L. Messonnier and H.K. Cordell. 1994. Assessing the demand for designated wildlife viewing sites. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing 2(3):75-93.
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$23.97
Per Person Per Day
Bergstrom, J.C. and H.K. Cordell. 1991. An analysis of the demand for and value of outdoor recreation in the United States. Journal of Leisure Research 23(1):67-86.
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$26.84
Per Person Per Day
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$3.02
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA, KS, MN, MO, ND, NE, SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.65
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA, KS, MO, ND, NE, SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.65
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$15.09
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR, LA, OK, TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.21
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL, KY, MS, TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$13.58
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE, FL, GA, MD, NC, SC, VA, WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$15.09
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR, LA, OK, TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.21
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$15.09
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.18
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ, NM, OK, TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.67
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO, KS, MT, ND, NE, UT, WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$42.25
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$51.30
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK, CA, HI, OR, WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.67
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ, CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, UT, WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.77
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK, CA, HI, NV, OR, WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.67
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ, CO, ID, MT, NM, UT, WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.26
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT, WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$13.58
Per Person Per Day*
Boyle, K.J., B. Roach and D.G. Waddington. 1998. 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting, and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Report 96-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$24.14
Per Person Per Day*
Brown, G.M. and M. Plummer. 1979. Recreation valuation: An economic analysis of nontimber uses of forestland in the Pacific Northwest. Pullman, WA: Forest Policy Project, Washington State University.
ID
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$226.95
Per Person Per Day
Brown, G.M. and M. Plummer. 1979. Recreation valuation: An economic analysis of nontimber uses of forestland in the Pacific Northwest. Pullman, WA: Forest Policy Project, Washington State University.
WA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$107.67
Per Person Per Day
Clayton, C. and R. Mendelsohn. 1993. The value of watchable wildlife: A case study of McNeil River. Journal of Environmental Management 39:101-106
AK
McNeil River
Bear
Contingent Valuation Method
$164.47
Per Person Per Day*
Clayton, C. and R. Mendelsohn. 1993. The value of watchable wildlife: A case study of McNeil River. Journal of Environmental Management 39:101-106
AK
McNeil River
Bear
Contingent Valuation Method
$200.70
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
AR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$34.02
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
AL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$35.74
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
ME
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.10
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
NH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$47.67
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
NY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.25
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
PA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.02
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.34
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
IL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.91
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
IN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$81.94
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
KS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$27.93
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
MI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.34
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
MN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$53.73
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
MO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.23
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
NE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.62
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
ND
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$47.62
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
OH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.98
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.42
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
WI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$31.86
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
FL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.67
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
GA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$47.30
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
KY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$40.00
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
LA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.10
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
MS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$42.82
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
NC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.93
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
OK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.96
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
SC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.87
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.76
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$65.13
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
VA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$42.47
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.28
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.83
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
AZ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$35.84
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.58
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
CO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$53.99
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
ID
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$228.19
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
MT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.30
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
NV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$53.69
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
NM
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.58
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
OR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$56.08
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
UT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.02
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.98
Per Person Per Day*
Connelly, N.A. and T.L. Brown. 1988. Estimates of nonconsumptive wildlife use on Forest Service and BLM lands. Series No. 88-2. Ithaca, NY: Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.69
Per Person Per Day*
Cooper, J.C. and J.B. Loomis. 1991. Economic value of wildlife resources in the San joaquin Valley: Hunting and viewing values. In A. Dinar and D. Zilberman (eds.), The Economic and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Pp. 447-463.
CA
San Joaquin Valley
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$77.79
Per Person Per Day
Crandall, K.B. 1991. Measuring the economic benefits of riparian areas. MS thesis. University of Arizona.
AZ
Hassayampa River Preserve
Birds
Travel Cost Method
$104.86
Per Person Per Day*
Crandall, K.B. 1991. Measuring the economic benefits of riparian areas. MS thesis. University of Arizona.
AZ
Hassayampa River Preserve
Birds
Travel Cost Method
$118.03
Per Person Per Day*
Donovan, G. and P. Champ. 2009. The economic benefits of elk viewing at the Jewell Meadows Wildlife Area in Oregon. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14:51-60.
OR
Jewell Meadows Wildlife Area
Elk
Travel Cost Method
$433.31
Per Person Per Day
Edwards, P.E.T., G.R. Parsons and K.H. Myers. 2011. The economic value of viewing migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay: An application of the single site travel cost model using on-site data. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16(6):435-444.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Travel Cost Method
$41.79
Per Person Per Day
Eubanks, T. and J.R. Stoll. 1999. Avitourism in Texas: Two studies of birders in Texas and their potential support for the proposed world birding center. Report prepared for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Austin, TX: Fermata, Inc.
TX
Lower Rio Grande Valley
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$3.30
Per Person Per Day*
Eubanks, T. and J.R. Stoll. 1999. Avitourism in Texas: Two studies of birders in Texas and their potential support for the proposed world birding center. Report prepared for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Austin, TX: Fermata, Inc.
TX
Lower Rio Grande Valley
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$3.59
Per Person Per Day*
Eubanks, T.L, J.R. Stoll and P. Kerlinger. 2000. Wildlife -associated recreation on the New Jersey Delaware Bayshore. Prepared for the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife. Austin, TX: Fermata, Inc.
NJ
Delaware Bay
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$98.65
Per Person Per Day
Eubanks, T.L., R.B. Ditton and J.R. Stoll. 1998. Platte River nature recreation study: The economic impact of wildlife watching on the Platte River in Nebraska. Prepared for the US environmental Protection Agency, Region VII. Austin, TX: Fermata, Inc.
NE
Platte River
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.31
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The economics of selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
Aucilla Wildlife Management Area
Various
Travel Cost Method
$190.56
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The economics of selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
Babcock Webb Wildlife Management Area
Various
Travel Cost Method
$94.82
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The economics of selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
JW Corbett Wildlife Management Area
Various
Travel Cost Method
$94.80
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The economics of selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
Andrews Wildlife Management Area
Various
Travel Cost Method
$160.08
Per Person Per Day
Harding, D., M. Thomas and N. Stratis. 2003. The economics of selected Florida Wildlife Management Areas. Final Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission.
FL
Half Moon Wildlife Management Area
Various
Travel Cost Method
$81.51
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$24.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$37.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$66.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
HI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$90.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
RI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$35.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$61.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
KS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$44.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$28.60
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$35.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
LA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$22.00
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$26.40
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$30.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$24.20
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$74.80
Per Person Per Day
Hay, M.J. 1988. Net economic values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Report 85-2. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$74.80
Per Person Per Day
Johnston, R.J., T.A. Grigalunas, J.J. Opaluch, M. Mazzotta and J. Diamantedes. 2002. Valuing estuarine resource services using economic and ecological models: The Peconic Estuary System Study. Coastal Management 30:47-65.
NY
Peconic Estuary System
Various
Travel Cost Method - Individual
$77.40
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J. and L. Caughlan. 2003. Economic analysis of alternative bison and elk management practices on the National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton National Park: A comparison of visitor and household responses. Draft Report, April 14, 2003. Fort Collins, CO: USGS Biological Resources Division.
WY
Grand Teton National Park
Bison
Contingent Valuation Method
$60.37
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J. and L. Caughlan. 2003. Economic analysis of alternative bison and elk management practices on the National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton National Park: A comparison of visitor and household responses. Draft Report, April 14, 2003. Fort Collins, CO: USGS Biological Resources Division.
WY
Grand Teton National Park
Bison
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.54
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J. and L. Caughlan. 2003. Economic analysis of alternative bison and elk management practices on the National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton National Park: A comparison of visitor and household responses. Draft Report, April 14, 2003. Fort Collins, CO: USGS Biological Resources Division.
WY
National Elk Refuge
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$68.14
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J. and L. Caughlan. 2003. Economic analysis of alternative bison and elk management practices on the National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton National Park: A comparison of visitor and household responses. Draft Report, April 14, 2003. Fort Collins, CO: USGS Biological Resources Division.
WY
National Elk Refuge
Elk
Contingent Valuation Method
$33.21
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., D. Updike and W. Unkel. 1989. Consumptive and nonconsumptive values of a game animal: The case of California deer. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natual Resources Conference 54:640-650.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$10.63
Per Person Per Day*
Loomis, J.B., S. Yorizane and D. Larson. 2000. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(2):183-191.
CA
California Coast: Point Loma National Seashore, Monterey, Half Moon Bay, Point Reyes National Seashore
Grey Whale
Travel Cost Method
$437.41
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., S. Yorizane and D. Larson. 2000. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(2):183-191.
CA
California Coast: Point Loma National Seashore, Monterey, Half Moon Bay, Point Reyes National Seashore
Grey Whale
Travel Cost Method
$71.26
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., S. Yorizane and D. Larson. 2000. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(2):183-191.
CA
California Coast: Point Loma National Seashore, Monterey, Half Moon Bay, Point Reyes National Seashore
Grey Whale
Travel Cost Method
$70.44
Per Person Per Day
Loomis, J.B., S. Yorizane and D. Larson. 2000. Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(2):183-191.
CA
California Coast: Point Loma National Seashore, Monterey, Half Moon Bay, Point Reyes National Seashore
Grey Whale
Travel Cost Method
$122.87
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W. and S.M. Miller. 1994. Alaska voters, Alaska hunters, and Alaska nonresident hunters: Their wildlife related trip characteristics and economics. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$70.61
Per Person Per Day*
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID, UT WY
Payette, Targhee, Ashley, Dixie, Wasatch-Cache, Bridger-Teton
Various
Travel Cost Method
$18.75
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
CA
Angeles, Los Padres, Sierra, Lake Tahoe Basin MU, Inyo, Klamath
Various
Travel Cost Method
$20.45
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
OR, WA
Willamette, Ochoco, Wallowa-Whitman, Rogue River, Wenatchee, Mt Baker-Snoqualmie
Various
Travel Cost Method
$30.67
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
AK
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$14.10
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
AZ, NM
Apache-Sitgreaves, Tonto, Santa Fe, Gila
Various
Travel Cost Method
$21.62
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
ID, MT
Nezperce, Idaho Panhandle, Custer, Flathead
Various
Travel Cost Method
$21.19
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., G.L. Peterson, J.R. Arnold, D.C. Markstrom and D.M. Hellerstein. 1990. The net economic value of recreation on the National Forests: Twelve types of primary activity trips across nine Forest Service Regions. Research Paper RM-289. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
CO, WY
White River, san Juan, Pike-San Isabel, Bighorn, Shoshone
Various
Travel Cost Method
$20.91
Per Person Per Day
McCollum, D.W., M.A. Haefele and S.M. Miller. 1998. Attributes and the value of a recreation experience: A preliminary analysis of wildlife viewing in Denali National Park. In: P.M. Jakus (comp), Benefits and Costs of Resource Policies Affecting Public and Private Land: Eleventh Interim Report. Western Regional Research Publication W-133. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology. pp.179-200.
AK
Denali National Park
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$5.00
Per Person Per Day*
Miller, S.M. and D.W. McCollum. 1997. Alaska nonresident visitors: Their attitudes towards wildlife and wildlife related trip characteristics and economics. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$57.69
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$88.73
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.55
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.93
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$372.99
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$284.11
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$133.49
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$16.17
Per Person Per Day*
Myers, K.H., G.R. Parsons and P.E.T. Edwards. 2010. Measuring the recreational use value of migratory shorebirds on the Delaware Bay. Marine Resource Economics 25(3):247-264.
DE
Delaware Bay: Port Mahon and Mispillion Harbor
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$63.89
Per Person Per Day*
Richards, M.T. 1980. An economic measure of nonconsumptive wildlife values: Implications for policy analysis. PhD dissertation. University of Arizona.
AZ
Southeast Arizona
Various
Travel Cost Method
$51.52
Per Person Per Day*
Shafer, E.L., R. Carline, R.W. Guldin and H.K. Cordell. 1993. Economic amenity values of wildlife: Six case studies in Pennsylvania. Environmental Management 17(5):669-682.
PA
Middle Creek
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$7.14
Per Person Per Day
Shafer, E.L., R. Carline, R.W. Guldin and H.K. Cordell. 1993. Economic amenity values of wildlife: Six case studies in Pennsylvania. Environmental Management 17(5):669-682.
PA
Hawk Mountain
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$25.07
Per Person Per Day
Shafer, E.L., R. Carline, R.W. Guldin and H.K. Cordell. 1993. Economic amenity values of wildlife: Six case studies in Pennsylvania. Environmental Management 17(5):669-682.
PA
PA game lands
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$40.88
Per Person Per Day
Stoll, J.R. and L.A. Johnson. 1984. Concepts of value, nonmarket valuation, and the case of the whooping crane. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 49:382-393.
TX
Aransas National Wildlife Refuge
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$8.05
Per Person Per Day*
Stoll, J.R., R.B. Ditton and M.E. Stokes. 2009. Sturgeon viewing as nature tourism: To what extent do participants value their viewing experiences and the resources upon which they depend? Journal of Ecotourism 8(3):254-268.
WI
Wolf River watershed: Shawano Dam, Bamboo Bend, and Pfeifer Park
Sturgeon
Contingent Valuation Method
$88.99
Per Person Per Day*
Stoll, J.R., R.B. Ditton and T.L. Eubanks. 2006. Platte River birding and the spring migration: Humans, value, and unique ecological resources. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11(4):241-254.
NE
Platte River Study Area
Birds
Contingent Valuation Method
$20.17
Per Person Per Day*
Upneja, A., E.L. Shafer, W. Seo and J. Yoon. 2001. Economic benefits of sport fishing and angler wildlife watching in Pennsylvania. Journal of Travel Research 40:68-78.
PA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$132.38
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.09
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ND
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$17.38
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.98
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.50
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.93
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$64.31
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$116.45
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
DE
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.98
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
FL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$67.78
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
GA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.93
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
KY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$41.71
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MD
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$24.33
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MS
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$52.14
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.67
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
SC
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$43.45
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.50
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
TX
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$53.88
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$71.26
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$20.86
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AK
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$85.16
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
AZ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$59.09
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.40
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.98
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
HI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.67
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ID
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.24
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.50
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NV
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$78.21
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NM
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$86.90
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
OR
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.93
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$147.73
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
WY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.67
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
UT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.40
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
CT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$46.93
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
ME
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$36.50
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$39.98
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NH
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$62.57
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NJ
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$102.55
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
NY
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$48.67
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
PA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$45.19
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
RI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$29.55
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
VT
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$27.81
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IL
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$55.62
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$123.40
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
IA
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$20.86
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MI
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.40
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MN
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$38.24
Per Person Per Day*
Waddington, D.G., K.J. Boyle and J. Cooper. 1994. 1991 net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting, and wildlife watching. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
MO
---
Various
Contingent Valuation Method
$50.40
Per Person Per Day*
Wellman, K.F. and B. Noble. 1997. Selected recreational values of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program study area. Publication CCBNEP-18. Corpus Christi, TX: Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program.
TX
Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program
Birds
Travel Cost Method
$45.65
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$37.36
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$41.74
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$76.26
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$71.77
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$134.32
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$11.05
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$22.11
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$19.86
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$24.06
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$35.59
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$42.74
Per Person Per Day*
Zawacki, W.T., A. Marsinko and J.M. Bowker. 2000. A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest Science 46(4):496-506
USA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$14.42
Per Person Per Day*
Ziemer, R.F. and W.N. Musser. 1978. The demand for and value of wildlife recreation in Georgia. Research Bulletin 221. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural Economics.
GA
---
Various
Travel Cost Method
$36.47
Per Person Per Day
Reference Location

Site

Primary Species

Other Species

Ownership

Wilderness

Survey
Type

Data Year(s)

Visitor Type

Sample
Summary
Stats
Provided

Response
Rate (%)

Sample Frame

Valuation Method

Regression
Model
Provided

Sample
Size

Stated
Preference
Elicitation
Method

Stated
Preference
Payment
Vehicle

Stated
Preference
Payment Type

Revealed Preference
Substitute Price
Included
in Regression

Revealed
Preference
Observations
Truncated

Revealed Preference
Corrected for
Endogenous
Stratifaction

Revealed Preference
Cost/Mile
Used

Revealed Preference
Opportunity Cost
of Time Included
in Regression

Revealed Preference
Opportunity Cost
of Time Used

Revealed Preference
% of Wage
Rate Used

Revealed Preference
Single Destination
Trips Only

Revealed Preference
Primary Purpose
Visitors Only

Group
Size

Days
per Trip

Economic
Value
Estimate
(2014)

Units

WY

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$115.08

Per Person Per Day

AK

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$42.28

Per Person Per Day

AL

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$50.49

Per Person Per Day

AZ

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$345.24

Per Person Per Day

AR

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$50.49

Per Person Per Day

AZ

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$76.33

Per Person Per Day

CA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$111.55

Per Person Per Day

AK

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$123.30

Per Person Per Day

CA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$86.90

Per Person Per Day

CO

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$51.67

Per Person Per Day

CT

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$58.71

Per Person Per Day

DE

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$17.61

Per Person Per Day

FL

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$137.39

Per Person Per Day

FL

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$45.79

Per Person Per Day

GA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$51.67

Per Person Per Day

HI

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$77.51

Per Person Per Day

ID

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$61.06

Per Person Per Day

WY

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$56.37

Per Person Per Day

IL

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$78.68

Per Person Per Day

ID

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$43.45

Per Person Per Day

IL

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$39.93

Per Person Per Day

IN

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$30.53

Per Person Per Day

IA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$405.13

Per Person Per Day

IA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$37.58

Per Person Per Day

KS

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$36.40

Per Person Per Day

KY

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$61.06

Per Person Per Day

LA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$36.40

Per Person Per Day

MA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$46.98

Per Person Per Day

MA

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$44.62

Per Person Per Day

MD

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$22.31

Per Person Per Day

ME

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Non-residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

1

$62.24

Per Person Per Day

ME

---

Various

---

Public and Private Land

---

---

2006

Residents

No

78

General Population

Contingent Valuation Method

No

11279

Open-ended

Trip Cost

Per Use

---

---